Hi Richard, Thank you for looking into this. We have discussed this internally with Intel legal folks, and as you pointed out earlier, those Intel signed binaries are actually built from "3-clause BSD" source code: https://github.com/intel/linux-sgx/tree/master/psw/ae https://github.com/intel/linux-sgx/tree/master/psw/ae/data/prebuilt Given this, probably in spec file License field we should use "BSD,NetCDF" instead of "Redistributable, no modification permitted" for the Intel signed binaries? BTW, it seems the license content for Intel signed binaries is stale. Intel SGX team is working on updating it. -Yunying _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
