On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:57 AM Omair Majid <omajid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Jilayne, > > Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:07 PM Omair Majid <omajid@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> 4. What license is this file under? > >> > >> https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/System.Text.RegularExpressions/tests/FunctionalTests/AttRegexTests.cs > >> > >> Should I treat it as under MIT, like the license header at the top of > >> the file says, or under the separate license text on line 4 and > >> later? Or both? Does anyone know what's the SPDX identifier for the > >> license text on line 4 and later? > > > > I'd probably conclude 'both' based on limited information. Also, I > > think the separate license text is something that ought to match to > > SPDX "MIT" but doesn't, so I think the best thing to do here is to > > submit an issue to https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML proposing > > a change to the XML file > > (https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/src/MIT.xml) that > > specifies what "MIT" means as an SPDX identifier. Jilayne can probably > > provide more helpful guidance here. > > Any advice here? The wording in the second half of the license has > several textual differences from MIT. How should I handle this? > MIT is a category license in SPDX (for now), like how MIT and BSD are in Fedora identifiers. It's an odd deviation, but I'm not sure what we're supposed to do here either. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
