On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:44:10AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 5:37 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just to be clear: These changes are the result of the changes to the
actual license text, and the previous license is still acceptable to
Fedora? (It would theoretically be possible that as part of the review,
it became clear that upstream's and Fedora's interpretation of the
previous license terms had been different, and upstream's interpretation
is incompatible with Fedora's requirements.)
Good question. Yes, the previous license (used with Nmap < 7.90) is
still considered acceptable for Fedora.
And an update to:
https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect-data-fedora/blob/master/licenses/fedora.json
?
There is currently only this entry:
"Nmap License": {
"approved": "yes",
"fedora_abbrev": "Nmap",
"fedora_name": "Nmap License",
"id": "365",
"license_text": "",
"spdx_abbrev": "",
"spdx_name": "",
"url": "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Nmap";
},
Thanks,
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
