For your original question: - I would suggest putting as the license tag "MIT AND GPL-2.0-only" as you suggested unless it is inappropriate to use SPDX identifiers given they have not yet been formally adopted for use in license tags by Fedora, in which case use the Callaway equivalent "MIT and GPLv2". - I would not bother including a copy of GPLv2 however, but there's no harm in doing so other than a possible future inconsistency in policy. Richard On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:29 PM Maxwell G <gotmax@e.email> wrote: > > While I think it's important to refresh the policies/documentation > around this, I would appreciate an answer to my original question about > yq so I can proceed with the review. > > > -- > Thanks, > > Maxwell G (@gotmax23) > Pronouns: He/Him/His > _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
