On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:29 PM Jilayne Lovejoy <jlovejoy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not sure who is authorized to be the "someone on the Fedora side" to give the OK, but I had a (re)read of the license and here are a few thoughts: > > I think it meets the concept of free/open for Fedora as I understand it. The fact that it's been okay'd for inclusion in RHEL supports this, as I think the criteria for Fedora and RHEL (and any Red Hat open source project or product, perhaps?) is or should be aligned. > We need a license tag and the entry updated in the Licensing:Main wiki page that packagers reference to indicate this license is acceptable for Fedora. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
