Re: yq Licensing Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 3:15 PM Maxwell G <gotmax@e.email> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am reviewing yq, which is an MIT-licensed, statically linked (all go binaries are statically linked) go project that builds against golang-github-timtadh-data-structures-devel. The latter is licensed under GPL-2.0-only. My understanding is that distributing yq binaries with just the MIT license file as is constitutes a GPL violation.
>
> While we're waiting for upstram to rectify this situation (I filed an issue), would it be permissible to set the License field to `MIT AND GPL-2.0-only`, include a copy of the GPL v2 in the package, and add a comment to the specfile explaining the situation?

This is an interesting question since Jilayne Lovejoy and I have
recently been working on revised legal documentation for Fedora that
among other things deals with the topic of what to put in the License:
field given the anticipated migration to the use of SPDX identifiers.
But we haven't considered a case like this one. If I understand
correctly (I have passing familiarity with Go and close to zero
understanding of how Go projects are built and packaged for Fedora)
the yq rpm would contain a binary that is statically linked against
golang-github-timtadh-data-structures, but the source package of the
yq rpm will not itself contain the source code of
golang-github-timtadh-data-structures (i.e. it won't be "vendored"
[bleh]), which however will be separately packaged in Fedora. Is that
accurate or am I misunderstanding? Surely this sort of question has
come up before for Fedora Go packages... or has it?

Richard
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux