Re: SPDX identifiers for xmag-1.0.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



V Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:38:40AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> Dne 15. 07. 22 v 9:44 Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> > Could legal team look at this license, add the identifier to the Fedora
> > database, and decide whether it is acceptable for Fedora packages?
> 
> You can make the process slightly faster if you open new issue here
> 
> https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues
> 
Regarding missing MIT-open-group: I opened
<https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/34>.

Regarding the other unknown MIT license: It turned out that it's "X11", also
missing <https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/1>.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux