On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 11:44 AM Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > In python-ezdxf 0.18, a few new Python modules are included that are > derived from other software. The License is therefore no longer simply > “MIT.” Of the new modules in question, one is a fork of its original > upstream. I have treated it as a bundled dependency, adding the > appropriate virtual Provides. The others are full rewrites from > different languages; the licenses of the original projects still affect > the ezdxf License, but I have not treated them as bundled dependencies > since no code is copied from the original projects. See the comments in > the spec file above the License field if the details matter to you. > > In classic “Calloway” notation, the new License field would become: > > MIT and (ISC and MIT) and (AGPLv3 and MIT) > > However, I am taking the opportunity to convert the package to SPDX, and > so the License will become: > > (MIT AND (ISC AND MIT) AND (AGPL-3.0-only AND MIT)) Under our new License: field guidelines, a simple license expression (just a license identifier, basically) wouldn't get repeated in a conjunctive composite expression, even if it applies to multiple separable components, and there ordinarily would be no reason to wrap AND subexpressions in parentheses. I haven't looked at this package but it might be that the License: field should be: MIT AND ISC AND AGPL-3.0-only See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_conjunctive_and_licensing Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
