Re: Do we need to strip code with use restrictions from the tarball, or is deleting in %prep enough?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:26 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Assuming an upstream tarball contains one example file under the BSD license
> with the following usage restriction:
>
>   * You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or intended for
>   * use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear
>   * facility.
>
> Can we rm that nonfree file in %prep, or do we need to strip it from the
> tarball as well?
>
> My assumption is that we strip content that we cannot even re-distribute from
> SRPM, which should not be the case here, but I am not sure.
>
I agree that it's best to remove it from the tarball so that it
doesn't end up in the SRPM.

The difference between this license and the "Nuclear Variant" of MIT
is that the Nuclear Variant says "we're not responsible for anything
that happens if you use it in this context" but it does not forbid the
use the way this license does.
-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux