Dne 02. 01. 23 v 6:34 Benson Muite
napsal(a):
available in a package. However, not all licenses are compliant with each other. A chart indicating which licenses can be included with other licenses is available at: https://dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html Would it be possible to create a similar chart for all SPDX identifiers that can be used in Fedora? This would enable adding such a check to fedora-review.
IANAL but this can be hardly applied to package. This graph can be applied on the same or derived work. But not on the collection of work. Which package is.
E.g., I can have a package which contains tools:
/usr/bin/foo
/usr/bin/bar
foo is licensed as LGPLv2.1 and bar is licensed as MPL 1.1. Although these two licenses are not compatible, I see no problem to have these two separate tools in the same package. And package to have license LGPL-2.1-or-later AND MPL 1.1 (or what is the SPDX id).
Miroslav
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
