Richard Fontana wrote: > Apparently Doxygen injects various pieces of minified JavaScript Sphinx does similar things. > Anyway, I would guess no Fedora package maintainer of a package that > has a Doxygen docs subpackage is taking this issue into account when > thinking about License: tags. I'm a counterexample, or maybe I'm just the exception that confirms the rule. I have text like this in some of my spec files: %package doc Summary: Documentation for the XML/Ada library BuildArch: noarch License: AdaCore-doc AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause # License for the documentation is AdaCore-doc. The Javascript and CSS files # that Sphinx includes with the documentation are BSD 2-Clause and MIT-licensed. I wish Sphinx would put those files in a subpackage that documentation packages could depend on, instead of multiplying them all over the distribution. Then I wouldn't have to analyze their licenses for my License tags, and would have more time for useful work. The dependency should preferably be added automatically. Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgpM6gyx_b7D7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
