Re: kickstart files and trademark licensing question on Ask Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would suggest discussing it further with Kristin - it may be that I
mis-explained the nature of what kickstart files are and how they're
used.

- Richard

On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 1:32 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. That seems pretty strong — they're just sharing a kickstart file,
> after all.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 11:41:37AM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > I had a discussion with Kristin Borths (Red Hat's trademark lawyer)
> > last week about this and also refreshed my memory on the license of
> > fedora-logos. The conclusion was that the person asking the question
> > should comply with all the requirements that apply to use of the
> > Fedora Remix secondary mark
> > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/trademarks/#_distributing_combinations_of_fedora_software_with_non_fedora_or_modified_fedora_software)
> >
> > BTW I think that part of the Fedora trademark guidelines is somewhat
> > confusing because it doesn't speak to situations where one is creating
> > something that would qualify as a 'remix' but doesn't use the
> > secondary mark.
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 2:09 PM Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 10:14 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/does-distributing-a-kickstart-file-containing-non-free-repositories-violate-fedora-licensing-guidelines/86697
> > >
> > > Question is: "I have a kickstart file that uses rpmfusion non-free
> > > repos in the %post section to install Nvidia drivers. I do not remove
> > > Fedora branding packages in the kickstart file. Would I be in
> > > violation of Fedora’s Licensing Guidelines if I were to publish this
> > > kickstart file on my blog or in a Gist on GitHub? Or do the licensing
> > > guidelines only apply to installation media like an ISO?
> > >
> > > Also, if it is in violation, would it then be acceptable if I just
> > > removed the Fedora branding packages in the kickstart file?"
> > >
> > > For a definitive answer this should probably be run by Red Hat's
> > > trademark counsel, but my thought is that merely publishing such a
> > > kickstart file on a blog or Github gist would not require trademark
> > > permission. But if it's part of some larger effort to create and
> > > distribute a Fedora derivative, the requirements relating to branding
> > > of Fedora remixes should be followed.
> > >
> > > Richard
> >
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fedora Project Leader
>
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux