So, it's the exceptions that are not (or may not be) on the SPDX License List. Can you send me a link to the text for those?
Thanks,
Jilayne
On 2/9/23 8:13 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi all,
ppisar was doing the license review of the package when it arrived into EPEL 9 and proposed to update the SPEC file to the latest FPG. Since Fedora Licensing now requires SPDX names for licenses, he found two of them without SPDX name in sane-frontends:
GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Autoconf-exception-2.0-like exceptionGPL-2.0-or-later WITH gnu-javamail-exception-like exceptionThe former is used in config.guess+config.guess files generated Autoconf, the latter is a license which is used in SANE project.
Would it be possible to review the licenses and assign a SPDX identifiers for them? Or make an agreement to use just GPL-2.0-or-later?
Thank you in advance!
Zdenek
-- Zdenek Dohnal Software Engineer Red Hat, BRQ-TPBC
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
