Re: W3C Community Final Specification Agreement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:51 PM Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have a followup question to a gitlab issue [1].  There are 3 files
> in the SMuFL repository [2], classes.json, glyphnames.json, and
> ranges.json, that are currently bundled in the mscore package.  It
> would be advantageous to break those files out into a separate package
> for consumption by other SMuFL-aware software.  The determination in
> [1] is that the presence of those files does not require a change to
> the mscore package License field.  What about if they are in their own
> package?  What would the License field of that package be?

Hmm. I will follow up on this in the original issue. I was hoping to
make the problem go away but that may not be possible.

Richard
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux