On 04. 04. 23 16:55, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
during a package review I came across this License tag (simplified):
License: ((Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause) AND (Apache-2.0 OR MIT)
Where "(Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause" is a license of one "unit" built
into the RPM and "Apache-2.0 OR MIT" is a license of another "unit". (Both
units are built into a single binary if that makes a difference.)
Do I change that to:
License: (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause
Or not?
I know that we are not supposed to calculate "effective license", but in my
head they both mean the exact same thing.
For clarity, this is the actual case:
https://git.sr.ht/~gotmax23/fedora-python-orjson/tree/b823cdba3e42ea2d7b04937061f19b0a0afd7162/item/python-orjson.spec#L39-61
License: (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) AND ((Apache-2.0 OR
MIT) AND BSD-3-Clause) AND Apache-2.0
I suggested to turn it into:
License: (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) AND BSD-3-Clause AND
Apache-2.0
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
