On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:03 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dne 19. 10. 23 v 11:18 Sandro Mani napsal(a): > > Hi > > Updating mingw-sip I've re-verified the license to convert it to SPDX, and came across the SIP license which does not exist as a SPDX identifier. [1] states > > """ > > SIP is available under the following licenses. > > SIP License. This is very similar to the Python Software Foundation license used for Python itself. > GNU General Public License v2 > GNU General Public License v3 > > """ > > I take this should be > > License: SIP OR GPL-v2.0-only OR GPL-v3.0-only > > (provided SIP existed as a SPDX identifier)? > > The full SIP License text is attached. > > See: > > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/377 > > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/merge_requests/421 The License: tag in this case should be `GPL-2.0-only OR GPL-3.0-only` because we normally don't include not-allowed licenses in OR-expressions having allowed operands (the big exception being Perl packages which are allowed to use `GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl` and `GPL-2.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl). I'm working on a big revision to the documentation on license tags and am using the sip package as an example. Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
