Re: License check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/6/24 02:06, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 06. 02. 24 v 5:52 Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
Could someone check my work here:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/orion/rpms/ccache/tree/unbundle

If I need to list the remaining bundled code, I think I have:

# See LICENSE.adoc for licenses of bundled codes
# blake3 is Apache-2.0
# minitrace.h is MIT
# span.hpp is BSL-1.0
# url.cpp/hpp is MIT
License:        GPL-3.0-or-later AND Apache-2.0 AND BSL-1.0 AND MIT

Thank you!

I see few more:

http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spdx-reports/ccache


Right, thanks for that. But the branch I posted has had some work unbundling a number of items.

But mainly I was looking for confirmation that I do need to list all of the licenses of all of the third_party code.

I think https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/ could be clearer on this point.

--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager                         720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux