On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:25 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At this point, this discussion is a bit much. > > We have game engines with data file downloaders for demo content, we > have web browsers that auto-download things on launch, and so on. > > If you're really worried about it, tweak pytorch to require > configuration or make a prompt when it triggers the first time or something. > > We did this with gdb with the debuginfod, and that's probably the > closest pattern to go with for this. > > But this is not a legal question per se, this is a functionality and > philosophy question. I mean, why isn't it a legal question in some cases? What if a package on first launch downloads an unauthorized copy of _Pirates of the Caribbean_? I might be okay with the answer that "this has never happened and we can deal with that problem if it ever arises". It is a philosophical question, I think, whether Fedora would want to tolerate the possibility of a package circumventing Fedora licensing policy through post-installation downloads (leaving aside the issue of user agency in this). That is directly raised by this pretrained weights issue since at least some of the weights Tim is talking about wouldn't satisfy Fedora licensing guidelines if packaged directly. I don't think there's a right or wrong answer here, but I think Fedora ought to have a consistent position on this. Richard -- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
