Dne 02. 08. 24 v 21:37 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 02. 08. 24 v 9:07 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):Here it comes https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-legal-docs/-/merge_requests/306I will love to see more usage of this tag, but I believe the documentatin has to be updated first. PR for packaging guidelines and legal doc is welcome.
Thank you for the PR, because this is hard one. I think that in ideal world, the PR should be worded in a way that:
1) The `SourceLicense` tag is always used and it fully describes the content of the SRPM, i.e. it should contain all licenses which would be identified by some (ideal) scanner
2) The `License` tag would be used in cases when the resulting (sub) package has different license from the `SourceLicense` (e.g. build scripts are not part of the resulting binary obviously).
The question is if we can get from the current state to the state I proposed above.
Vít
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
