[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 02. 08. 24 v 6:59 odp. Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
Rust packages generated with rust2rpm use it when it makes sense to
differentiate License of the built packages vs. license of the project
sources.

Is it?

SourceLicense tag is used only in 35 packages in whole Fedora. And only in 2 rust packages: rust2rpm-helper and rustup.


I will love to see more usage of this tag, but I believe the documentatin has to be updated first. PR for packaging guidelines and legal doc is welcome.

-- 
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- 
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux