[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 9:07 PM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dne 02. 08. 24 v 6:59 odp. Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
>
> Rust packages generated with rust2rpm use it when it makes sense to
> differentiate License of the built packages vs. license of the project
> sources.
>
> Is it?
>
> SourceLicense tag is used only in 35 packages in whole Fedora. And only in 2 rust packages: rust2rpm-helper and rustup.
>
>
> I will love to see more usage of this tag, but I believe the documentatin has to be updated first. PR for packaging guidelines and legal doc is welcome.

It looks like your query was too limited (rust* ?), there's more:

- bpftop
- corrosion
- clevis-pin-tpm2
- cosmic-comp
- fapolicy-analyzer
- firecracker
- helvum
- keyring-ima-signer
- librsvg2
- maturin
- ntpd-rs
- parsec
- ruff
- rustup
- rust2rpm-helper
- sad
- snapshot
- stgit
- sudo-rs
- trunk
- udev-hid-bpf

So at this point I'd say ~50% of usage of SourceLicense is in Rust packages.

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux