Re: Is this still Boehm-GC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/22/23 4:01 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Florian Weimer:

* Richard Fontana:

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:04 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The SPDX reference pattern uses “Copyright (c)”, and the second
paragraph is in ALL CAPS.  Furthermore, the Boehm-GC text says
“program” instead of “shellscript”.

# Copyright 2018 B. Persson, Bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
#
# This material is provided as is, with absolutely no warranty expressed
# or implied. Any use is at your own risk.
#
# Permission is hereby granted to use or copy this shellscript
# for any purpose, provided the above notices are retained on all copies.
# Permission to modify the code and to distribute modified code is granted,
# provided the above notices are retained, and a notice that the code was
# modified is included with the above copyright notice.
The SPDX XML file for Boehm-GC:
https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/main/src/Boehm-GC.xml
does not account for "shellscript" as an alternative to "program".

In SPDX (https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2-draft/license-matching-guidelines-and-templates/)
Details of copyright notices are ignored for matching purposes and
matching is case insensitive. Fedora is basically adopting the SPDX
understanding of what "matching" means for purposes of using SPDX
identifiers.

So probably what would need to be done here is getting SPDX to modify
the XML for Boehm-GC rather than assign a new identifier for this
variant.
Björn has changed “shellscript” to “program”:

   <https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/4580afce7cf577f324b7ba59fd44424d3d3b43ad?branch=rawhide

Is this sufficient to match SPDX Boehm-GC, even without the ALL CAPS and
(c) change?
yes.

Richard had meant to add the "shellscript" variation to the SPDX file for the license, but having the copyright holder "fix" this at the license level so there isn't such variation at all is even better!

Thanks Bjorn!
Sorry, I missed that you alread answered those questions, thanks.
So I think redhat-rpm-config is properly converted now.

Florian
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux