Dne 10. 12. 23 v 0:47 Mark Wielaard
napsal(a):
Even if it is, then it is still problematic to request Fedora contributors to file issues in these external third-pary proprietary trackers. Also we never just relied on third parties even if we closely worked together with the FSF and OSI, Fedora always reviewed more licenses than either of them, and I doubt the SPDX project will either.
Technically speaking Fedora is made "only" from software from external third-party software. We call it upstream and we encourage maintainers to file there issues all the time. :)
We do not rely on SPDX project. We utilize it. We do not rely on
it more than we rely on Gnome foundation, Linux foundation...
We have some licenses that does not meet SPDX inclusion principle
and we define them as LicenseRef-* We can do that without SPDX
approval and yet it is allowed by SPDX standard.
-- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
