Hi,
I have submitted rpm-local-generator-support package for a review [1]. It can't be simpler:
It essentially just creates empty file and places it into directory structure. I have used `License: MIT` tag, because what else.
But the package review
correctly pointed out that I should also ship the license
file, which would substantially complicate everything.
And now I wonder, is there even anything what would be licensable?
Is the empty file created somewhere in the directory structure
worth of anything? Can the License tag be omitted and would the
file be covered by the default Fedora license for .spec files?
Vít
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2244428
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
