On 05. 05. 23 16:28, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Chris Kelley wrote on 2023/05/05 22:55:
As a purely logical expression, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that sort of simplification not allowed?
This is no longer allowed:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis
Also
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_combined_disjunctive_and_conjunctive_license_expressions
which says:
"""
The license expression must reflect the disjunctive license choice even if one
or both of the license identifiers in the OR expression also appear separately
in the composite license expression.
...
License: (GPL-3.0-or-later OR MPL-1.1) AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND MIT
Here we repeat GPL-3.0-or-later because for one binary component it appears as
part of an OR subexpression. That is, OR expressions must be treated as though
they were a single distinct license.
"""
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
