On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:03 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dne 01. 09. 23 v 9:54 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a): > > Shorter is indeed better because it is far easier for humans to read when it is more concise, especially so because > > once the expression is flattened, the SPDX identifiers could be alphabetically orered as in this example above. > > Do we want to have it easier for humans or for machines? > > I think that we now target more machines (especially because of the "exchange" part from SPDX abbrev). If you want more > human friendly way you can feed the formula to some library and get abbreviated form. E.g., you can use `simplify()` from > > https://github.com/nexB/license-expression#usage-examples > > It is packaged in Fedora. > > And I agree that once we migrate to SPDX we should always present to **users** the simplified formula. But in sources > (in spec) we should track the full formula. I'm not sure if that `simplify()` does anything interesting - seems like it either just applies commutativity and associativity or else it may attempt to make further algebraic reductions that are questionable as equivalent expressions. I believe Mulhern made the related point in another thread that algebraic simplifications may not be possible (and I think the underlying point is that these are not true boolean expressions). Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
