[Fedora-legal-list] License change between Unicode 15.0.0 and 15.1.0? Unicode-DFS-2016 vs. Unicode-3.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

The upstream project of one of the packages I maintain has changed its
license metadata from `(MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016` to
`(MIT OR Apache-2.0` AND Unicode-3.0` in the last release:

https://github.com/dtolnay/unicode-ident/pull/28

The Unicode-DFS-2016 license text is indeed no longer available from
the unicode.org website, where it has been replaced with the
Unicode-3.0 license text.

As far as I know, the Unicode-DFS-2016 license was applicable to code
derived from Unicode data - is this no longer the case? Has the
Unicode-3.0 license replaced it for this purpose?

If this is indeed the case, does this need to be reflected in other
places (like the Rust standard library / compiler), which reference
the old Unicode-DFS-2016 license text, too?

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux