On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 10:14 AM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/does-distributing-a-kickstart-file-containing-non-free-repositories-violate-fedora-licensing-guidelines/86697 Question is: "I have a kickstart file that uses rpmfusion non-free repos in the %post section to install Nvidia drivers. I do not remove Fedora branding packages in the kickstart file. Would I be in violation of Fedora’s Licensing Guidelines if I were to publish this kickstart file on my blog or in a Gist on GitHub? Or do the licensing guidelines only apply to installation media like an ISO? Also, if it is in violation, would it then be acceptable if I just removed the Fedora branding packages in the kickstart file?" For a definitive answer this should probably be run by Red Hat's trademark counsel, but my thought is that merely publishing such a kickstart file on a blog or Github gist would not require trademark permission. But if it's part of some larger effort to create and distribute a Fedora derivative, the requirements relating to branding of Fedora remixes should be followed. Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
