[Fedora-legal-list] Re: Should I mention Build-scripts' licensing terms in a spec's License field?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:33 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dne 01. 08. 24 v 12:28 odp. Peter Lemenkov napsal(a):
> > Hello!
> > I stumbled upon the following situation. I am packaging a library
> > under MIT license. However the upstream-provided build-script in a
> > tarball explicitly licensed under ISC license (has a header with ISC
> > license). If it matters I do not use this script for building at all.
> > So I have two questions.
> >
> > 1. If a tarball has a differently licensed file which is not going to
> > a final RPM should I still list its license in a spec's %license
> > field?
> > 2. Does it change anything if this file wasn't used at all during RPM
> > build process?
> >
> See
>
>    https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-legal-docs/-/issues/61
>
>  > Does not affect the License tag. But the license of the file must be from the allowed list.
>

That's not the full answer. We do have a way to represent this
information by using the SourceLicense tag. This tag should be used to
define a superset of the License tag information in this case, since
it's used to override License for the SRPM.

However, this tag does not exist before RHEL 9.4 for EPEL purposes.

Note that for packages of static-link ecosystems like Rust and Go,
this is flipped: the License tag is a superset of the SourceLicense
tag, as the License tag represents the mixture of licenses for all the
statically linked packages, whereas SourceLicense just indicates the
license of the sources shipped in the SRPM.



--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux