Re: Fwd: SPDX Statistics - R.U.R. edition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 13. 02. 23 v 10:42 Benson Muite napsal(a):
And no need to even rebuild it.
Should this also be done for MIT license when there is no change going
to SPDX?

Yes.

But especially with the MIT I strongly suggest to check the actuall license text. I find the

https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff#installation

as great tool for this.

According my personal experience about 50-80 % of Callaway MIT string are translated to SPDX MIT string.

But rest of the cases the MIT is something different in SPDX. The known option so far are:

'mpich2', 'libtiff', 'SMLNJ', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'NTP', 'MIT', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-e
nna', 'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-CMU', 'ICU', 'HPND', 'BSL-1.0', 'Adobe-Glyph'

Miroslav

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux