On Mon Feb 13, 2023 at 10:27 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 13. 02. 23 v 4:09 Maxwell G napsal(a): > > I made a breakdown for myself. \ > > Great. Thank you. > > > an you remove the 18 packages that I > > confirmed off of your list? > > > > > > > > Packages that should be removed from this list > > --------------------------------------------- > > I can amend my script to skip these packages. But for a history, it would be great if the information is stored > somewhere in the infrastructure. > > Either in spec file change log. Or in dist-git log. > > You can: > > git commit --allow-empty "checked that license match SPDX identifier" > > git push > > And no need to even rebuild it. > > My script checks existence of /spdx/i string in both spec changelog and git-log and if it is there then it is skipped. > > Miroslav This seems like a misuse of distgit to me. I don't want to push random empty commits unless they're needed to rebuild the package. Perhaps we can come up with a better way to handle this? -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/They
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
