On 12/23/22 2:03 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
Omair Majid <omajid@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
3. What to do about the following licenses:
https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/blob/main/src/libraries/System.Text.RegularExpressions/tests/FunctionalTests/AttRegexTests.cs
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT#HP_Variant
Both seem look like variants of MIT [2][3]. As folks in this thread
have helped me understand, MIT is a category under SPDX, not a single
license. Neither of these are part of the MIT SPDX identifier yet. Is
it okay to use them under the 'MIT' identifier in Fedora while they
are still being worked on the SPDX and fedora-license-data side?
There's still no progress here, but I am going to run with using the MIT
identifier for .NET, even if this exact license texts aren't in
fedora-license-data, yet.
Omair
Hi Omair,
Just following up on this: the two licenses above that you say have no
progress, so they have issues in the Fedora-license-list Gitlab repo,
and, if applicable, SPDX?
Thanks!
Jilayne
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
