Re: License question on rewrites in different languages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 11:22 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>

(snip)

>
> I vaguely remember, that the Rust packaging automation was approved
> based on the condition, that there are SPDX licenses listed in metadata.
> I don't think and Cargo licensing guidelines were evaluated along the
> way. But if the was different standard for Cargo licenses in metadata,
> then in Fedora, Rust packaging automation should be disabled, because we
> cannot trust the license information.

I don't know what you're talking about here, but this might predate my
time at the Rust SIG (or you do indeed vaguely mis-remember). ;)

The creation of spec files for Rust crates is automated to varying
degrees with rust2rpm, and the tool pre-fills the License tag with
metadata from the upstream project, just like it prefills Name,
Summary, and %description. But that does not absolve the packager from
checking that this information is actually correct. If this were not
the case, this thread would not exist.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux