On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 9:29 PM Jilayne Lovejoy <jlovejoy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 1/3/23 12:39 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > > Separately, but related to Florian's question, I think we should make > > clear in documentation (if we don't already) that fedora-license-data > > is not intended to deal with questions about license compliance, > > except to the extent that impossibility or impracticality of > > compliance with a license may be a reason for concluding that it is > > not allowed. > > not sure where to put that or what exactly to say... did you have an idea? > as a threshold question, should that note go in the license-data repo > itself or the Fedora-legal documentation? I think it should go in the legal documentation. The issue is really the nonsuitability of the fedora-license-data issue tracker for handling compliance questions. _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
