On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 1:43 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I looked at your package, and what surprised me is that you patched > > the Cargo.toml file to "correct" the upstream license metadata, given > > that the upstream project has rejected the change. > > The downstream patch to the crate metadata is only there because we > use crate metadata to automatically collect licenses of dependencies > for statically linked binaries. > I.e. the crate metadata should reflect the license of the Fedora > package, otherwise the method to collect licenses of dependencies > would be wrong. Ah, now I understand! Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
