Re: Permissibility of P-434 based elliptic curve in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:11 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:05 PM Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 7:01 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 4:25 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > During package review of the fiat-crypto Rust library, I noticed that
> > > > it contains an implementation of an elliptic curve (p434) which isn't
> > > > mentioned on the "good" list here:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:ECC
> > > >
> > > > I also can't find any references or sources for this curve (search
> > > > results for P-434, p434, and curve434 all come up empty). The only
> > > > mention of "p434" with respect to cryptography is in this Microsoft
> > > > project: https://github.com/microsoft/PQCrypto-SIDH
> > > >
> > > > And looking at the source code, I'm not even sure whether the P-434
> > > > curve in fiat-crypto is at all related to SIKEp434 / SIDHp434 schemes
> > > > that are mentioned there, other than the fact that they happen to be
> > > > based on the same prime number (2^216 * 3^137 - 1).
> > > >
> > > > Given that there's no mention of any elliptic curves that use p434 on
> > > > the internet (that I could find), is it OK to ship it in a Fedora
> > > > package, or do we need to remove it from the sources?
> > > >
> > > > ref. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005536
> > >
> > > The linked package review is still blocked by this issue six months later :(
> > > Any idea what I can do to move this forward?
> >
> > Unfortunately I am pretty sure it won't be possible to get a
> > resolution on this any time soon.
>
> Ok, so ... I'm pretty sure we actually don't *need* the affected code.
> Would removing all p434 related code from the sources entirely (to be
> on the safe side), and building the package without support for this
> curve, be an acceptable solution until the legal status is cleared up?

Yes, that's an acceptable solution in the meantime.

Richard
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux