-------- Přeposlaná zpráva --------
| Předmět: | SPDX Statistics - House Sign Edition |
|---|---|
| Datum: | Fri, 19 Jul 2024 12:05:31 +0200 |
| Od: | Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Společnost: | Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. |
| Komu: | Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hot news:
* FESCO agreed on decision about conversions. But there was a confusion about the wording, so the ticket is reopened https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3230
* The confusion is just about "trivial" conversions. All others
will be converted to LicenseRef-Callaway-$OLDID before Change
Completation deadline (mid of August).
* Richard reviewed all Nmap licenses. All of them were
declined. Blocking new releases on Nmap in Fedora. Old version
is allowed in Fedora under exception.
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/?sort=updated_desc&state=closed&search=nmap&first_page_size=100
* We (stakeholders of this Change) resumed our investigation on
what tooling we should use to detect changes in new upstream
releases.
Two weeks ago we had:
* 24117 spec files in Fedora
* 30788 license tags in all spec files
* 10271 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet
* 4460 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
* Progress: 66,64% ░░░░░░████ 100%
ELN subset:
84 out of 2354 packages are not converted yet (progress 96.43%)
Today we have:
* 24223 spec files in Fedora
* 30899 license tags in all spec files
* 10114 tags have not been
converted to SPDX yet
* 4325 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx`
*
Progress: 67,27% ░░░░░░████ 100%
ELN subset:
80
out of 2354 packages are not converted yet
(progress 96.59%)
Graph of these data with the burndown chart:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt
List by package maintainers is here
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
New version of fedora-license-data has been released. With: 5 new licenses.
5 licenses are waiting to be reviewed by SPDX.org (and then
to be added to fedora-license-data) https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/?label_name%5B%5D=SPDX%3A%3Ablocked
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/
was updated too.
If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt
Either pull-request or
direct email to me is fine.
Why Hause sign edition? Because on today's date at 1770 my
hometown (Brno) introduced house numbering. BTW House numbering
has various implementation over the word and it is big rabbit
hole. [1]. I was wondering what was used before the house
numbers? Outside of the cities plain names of families were used
to identifies houses. But in big cities hause signs were used.
So we have House of Two Suns, House of White Swan etc. Here are
some pictures of house signs from Prague where they are still
present in old city.
http://www.notasthecrowsflies.com/2014/09/prague-house-signs-of-nerudova-street.html
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_numbering
-- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
