On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 1:14 AM Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm about to put a new package - libcupsfilters - under review to get it > into Fedora. It has the same license as CUPS - ASL 2.0 with exception, > which was taken from LLVM and we talked about it in thread mentioned in > subject. > > Now I checked > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ and I see > there Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception, which matches the contents of the > license and exception, but the name of the exception in the NOTICE file > is 'CUPS exception'. > > Is it okay from legal part to use SPDX name ' Apache-2.0 WITH > LLVM-exception' Yes, because, as you point out, the CUPS exception is identical to what SPDX calls "LLVM-exception". Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
