Thank you, Richard!
On 2/10/23 14:46, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 1:14 AM Zdenek Dohnal <zdohnal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm about to put a new package - libcupsfilters - under review to get it
into Fedora. It has the same license as CUPS - ASL 2.0 with exception,
which was taken from LLVM and we talked about it in thread mentioned in
subject.
Now I checked
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ and I see
there Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception, which matches the contents of the
license and exception, but the name of the exception in the NOTICE file
is 'CUPS exception'.
Is it okay from legal part to use SPDX name ' Apache-2.0 WITH
LLVM-exception'
Yes, because, as you point out, the CUPS exception is identical to
what SPDX calls "LLVM-exception".
Richard
--
Zdenek Dohnal
Software Engineer
Red Hat, BRQ-TPBC
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
