Re: Nonfree font(s) in 90-Second-Portraits (was: Effective license analysis: required or not?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 12:57 PM Jeremy Newton
<mystro256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I also noticed another one of my packages has a possible problematic font, but it's unclear to me:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/safetyblanket
> https://github.com/SimonLarsen/safetyblanket/blob/master/res/fonts/notalot35.ttf
>
> For the yb.ttf, I just replaced it with another font included in the source that's OFL in the %prep section. I assume this is sufficient?

I think so.

However, it's possible the atari.tff file is problematic too. It was
not clear to me how this was licensed even after locating a likely
origin for the file.

Richard
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux