On 11/6/23 08:28, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:31:47AM +0100, Mark Wielaard napsal(a): >> Hi, >> >> There is a man page in one of my packages that is distributed under >> the GFDL. This used to be a valid (documentation) license. But >> recently rpminspect (as run in bodhi) flags it as invalid, both the >> old-style tag GFDL (in f39) and the new-style tag >> GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later (in rawhide): >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-70de8a8207 >> https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/ca605c04-706a-4124-b73b-bb97d57c2b98/ >> BAD Unapproved license in elfutils-0.190-1.fc39.src: GFDL Not Waivable >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d4cc1aa93d >> https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/d3a446b9-ad10-40da-8fbc-526331385be0/ >> BAD Unapproved license in elfutils-0.190-2.fc40.src: GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later Not Waivable >> >> license-validate-20-1.fc38 did allow these licenses: >> $ license-validate -v --old "GFDL" >> Approved license >> $ license-validate -v "GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later" >> Approved license >> > I can reproduce it with > rpminspect-1.13-0.1.202310261816git5b272b3.fc40.x86_64. > > I believe a problem is that the license is not allowed in general. It is > only allowed for a documentation: > > $ cat data/GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later.toml > [license] > > expression = "GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later" > status = [ "allowed-documentation" ] > > so rpminspect probably raises a failure than assuming it's a documentation. > > There is a similar bug report > <https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect/issues/1237>. rpminspect is not supposed to make that distinction. That is, the allowed type matching the content type because it can't know or figure that out. We don't have any rules that map file types by any indicator to allowed category. If the license is "allowed*" in the database, rpminspect is supposed to consider that passing for the purposes of the License tag check. This sounds like a bug on my part. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
