Hi legal team,
I am trying to package finl_unicode [1][2], but we are having some
issues with the ambiguous Copyright notice stating that it is licensed
under Unicode license with "All rights reserved". The project uses
generated source code and it is a bit unclear what license these belong
to and what part of the code carries the Unicode license. We are trying
to ask for clarification if some of the code is actually
"Unicode-DFS-2016" licensed, and we are waiting for their reply.
So far we have made 2 PRs [3][4] that can side-step the obvious files
that are under the Unicode license, but we need advice on whether those
are sufficient or do we need to wait for more explicit confirmation form
upstream?
[1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279514
[2]: https://github.com/dahosek/finl_unicode
[3]: https://github.com/dahosek/finl_unicode/pull/17
[4]: https://github.com/dahosek/finl_unicode/pull/19
--
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
