On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:53 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And the second point is that we won't ever be able to 100% cover RPMs by > license scanners, but we could achieve that for SRPMs. I don't agree. I think the "less than 100%" would similarly apply to SRPMs. They're really the same inquiry with the same challenges (misidentified licenses, false positives, phony licenses ...). The only difference is that some of the enumerated licenses in a hypothetical `SourceLicense:` would be removed from `License:`. So `SourceLicense:` is maybe recording a step in the computation of `License:` that might otherwise not be recorded. Richard -- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
