V Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 06:53:41PM +0200, Fabio Valentini napsal(a): > simplification of "MIT AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0)" to just > "MIT" (since "MIT" already implies "MIT OR Apache-2.0" It does not imply that. Apache-2.0 license requires distributing Apache-2.0 license text, while MIT does not require distributing Apache-2.0 license text. A practical implication: If you have a binary package with "License: MIT OR Apache-2.0", you have to include Apache-2.0 license file with %license macro. Omitting the file means you have breached Apache-2.0 license. Another implication: You can reduce "MIT OR Apache-2.0" to "MIT". But such reduced package takes away a freedom from a recipient to choose the Apache-2.0 license. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
