Re: CDDL in system library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 06/18/2018 10:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:

> Fine, bug filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592445
> 
> If we change libxcrypt not to build the CDDL bits, what should we put
> into the RPM License tag?  Should we still list the CDDL eventhough it
> does not apply to the binaries?

The License tag reflects the code that is present in the binaries in the
RPM. Thus, in the case where the OpenSolaris code is not compiled in,
you do not need to include the CDDL in the License tag.

~tom
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/QHWRPK6RTQN6FA64AOZVTOLOEESIKPZK/




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux