2018-02-21 16:07 GMT+01:00 Fernando Nasser <fnasser@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 2018-02-19 11:25 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:24 AM, Fernando Nasser <fnasser@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > Would it be possible to add: > > BSD 2-clause > > to our table of valid licenses? > > > This is already accepted under the "BSD" moniker for Fedora license tags. > > > Oh, I see it now: > > BSD License (two clause) BSD (...) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#2ClauseBSD > > > > Aren't we using this plain "BSD" abbreviation too liberally? > > If you look at SPDX you'll see that there are BSD licenses and then BSD > licenses, some are ok for FSF, some for OSI, some for both, and some for > none (which is scary) (ref.: https://spdx.org/licenses/ ). > > > We want to get closer to the SPDX maybe it is time to use the more specific > abbreviations for these BSD licenses we have. > > > P.S.: Any interest in adding a SPDX abbrev column to our table? I can try > and help populating it. > > > --Fernando > This discussion was raised few years ago and stalled. I don't think it's useful to have a SPDX abbrev column. It'd be more interesting to switch to SPDX (or refine our own abbreviations). Regards, H. > > > _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
