On 03/28/2017 10:52 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: > For a long time I didn't know that Bodhi should be covered by the FPCA > so some commits have gone in from contributors who don't have Fedora > accounts. Pierre-Yves Chibon had mentioned to me that it was required > for contributors to sign the FPCA, but then I forgot to check that for > a long time until today, resulting in even more contributions that > weren't covered by the FPCA. > > I read the FPCA again today and noticed that it defines "Submit" with > examples that end with "version control systems administered by > Fedora". Though the examples do say "without limitation", the fact that > it doesn't just say "version control systems" seems to imply that > version control systems not administered by Fedora would not be > covered. Since Bodhi is on GitHub which is not administered by Fedora, > does Bodhi need FPCA for contributions? Is License In = License Out not > sufficient for Bodhi? > > If it is required, what should I do about the contributors from the > past who hadn't agreed to the FPCA? > > I wrote this pull request for the case that FPCA is required: > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1388 Since Bodhi is on GitHub, contributions to Bodhi do not require FPCA. License In = License Out is sufficient. ~tom == Red Hat _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
