For a long time I didn't know that Bodhi should be covered by the FPCA so some commits have gone in from contributors who don't have Fedora accounts. Pierre-Yves Chibon had mentioned to me that it was required for contributors to sign the FPCA, but then I forgot to check that for a long time until today, resulting in even more contributions that weren't covered by the FPCA. I read the FPCA again today and noticed that it defines "Submit" with examples that end with "version control systems administered by Fedora". Though the examples do say "without limitation", the fact that it doesn't just say "version control systems" seems to imply that version control systems not administered by Fedora would not be covered. Since Bodhi is on GitHub which is not administered by Fedora, does Bodhi need FPCA for contributions? Is License In = License Out not sufficient for Bodhi? If it is required, what should I do about the contributors from the past who hadn't agreed to the FPCA? I wrote this pull request for the case that FPCA is required: https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/1388
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
