On 2019-03-14 6:06 a.m., Tom Callaway
wrote:
Thanks Tom, I do see in https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause Note: This license has also been called the "Simplified BSD License" and the "FreeBSD License". See also the 3-clause BSD License. but this causes us some problems...
The licenses are collected automatically and included in the package docs and there are instance like: <packageName>liquid</packageName> and other similar entries with this license abbreviation.
The License: label has a and with the 3 licenses listed, and just
BSD will appear discrepant from what is included by the
automatically generated licenses file.
As https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause got its own SPDX identifier "BSD-2-Clause" could we not add it too?
Cheers, Fernando
|
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx