On 07/03/2018 04:06 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 07/03/2018 08:35 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Does this license still qualify as a BSD variant?
The Inner Net License drops condition 4.
Well, despite being based on BSD, the addition of clause 0 makes this a
new license. If Clause 0 is invoked, the result is non-free.
Right. But it is not dissimilar to the sell-yourself-into-slavery
clause in the GPLv3, so it should be okay.
Is this license on anything in Fedora?
radvd uses it, and probably a few other things in the IPv6 context. (It
may be KAME-related.) getaddrinfo in glibc is partly covered by it, too
(without the advertising clause).
Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/D3I7ROM5ATEDWLGFZ6DFKZXCZWYADBSM/
